Contextual Reasoning -complexity Analysis and Decision Procedures - on Earlier Drafts and Presentations of This Work. Moreover, I Wish to Thank
نویسندگان
چکیده
Formal accounts of contextual reasoning are of great importance for the development of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence theory and applications. This thesis’ contribution to the theory of contextual reasoning is twofold. First, it delineates the computational complexity of contextual reasoning. A first insight is obtained by translating contextual reasoning into a rather simple form of reasoning in bounded modal logic. A more direct and general understanding, as well as more refined complexity results, are established by achieving the so-called bounded model property for contextual satisfiability. Second, the thesis describes two conceptually orthogonal approaches to automatically deciding satisfiability in a contextual setting. Firstly, the bounded model property is exploited so as to encode contextual satisfiability into propositional satisfiability. This approach provides for the implementation of contextual reasoners based on existing propositional Sat solvers. Subsequently, a distributed decision procedure is proposed, which maximally exploits the potential amenity of localizing reasoning and restricting it to relevant contexts only. The latter approach is shown to be computationally superior to the former translation based procedure, and can be implemented using off-the-shelf efficient reasoning procedures.
منابع مشابه
Motivating the Unmotivated: Making Teacher Corrective Feedback Work
It is often wrongly assumed that the provision of teacher corrective feedback naturally entails learners' attendance to and application of it, but learners have repeatedly been reported not to pay attention to teacher feedback due to lack of motivation and the distracting effect of the grades they receive. The present study was an attempt to tackle this problem. To do so, the technique named Dr...
متن کاملAuthor Response to Comment on "Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning: A Case Series in North Iran"
Dear Editor; I wish to thank the authors for their careful comment (1), on our short report entitled “Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning: A Case Series in North Iran” (2). Unfortunately, as we were excited to display the findings of our series, some facts were missed from the methods of the article. The results presented in our series was collected from eight patients with definitive aluminum phosp...
متن کاملرابطهی نمرهی استدلال اخلاقی با ویژگیهای فردی و حرفهای پرستاران
As a result of the changes made in health care systems, nurses nowadays are faced with more complicated ethical dilemmas. Therefore, they need to be familiar with ethical decision-making procedures and have the ability to perform ethical reasoning. The present study aimed to evaluate this ability in nurses and investigate its relationship with demographic characteristics in a subspecialized hos...
متن کاملImprovement of Metadiscourse Use among Iranian EFL Learners through a Process- based Writing Course
The present study investigated the use of interactive metadiscourse resources (IMRs) in terms of appropriacy during a process- based writing course by applying qualitative and exploratory methods. Moreover, learners' perception was investigated to find out how confident they felt as they were writing and rewriting the drafts. 30 intermediate EFL learners were chosen to participate in this ...
متن کاملNeutrality in Liberal Legal Theory and Catholic Social Thought
1985. I presented an earlier version of this paper at the inaugural Symposium on Catholic Social Thought and the Law hosted by Villanova University School of Law in 2003. I wish to thank everyone at Villanova who helped to plan and organize that first symposium, especially Mark Sargent, who as Dean of Villanova has demonstrated a palpable enthusiasm for fostering the Catholic intellectual tradi...
متن کامل